|
| Nick Lane, Gifford lecture 2026 |
Evolutionary biochemist and author Nick Lane for the first time unequivocally rejected DNA- and gene-centric thinking in his Gifford Lecture on 8 Sep 2026.
|
| The paramount position of genes in biology. [8:54] |
In his previous public lectures he promoted the metabolism-first point of view and casually dismissed DNA-centric thinking. Now he started his lecture with a clear rejection of DNA-centric thinking. Since I have been blogging several times about DNA- and gene-centric thinking, I want to bring this lecture to the attention of my regular blog readers.
|
| Are genes a good guide to life on Earth? [21:39] |
I highly recommend this lecture especially for those who never watched a lecture of Nick Lane. This lecture is now the most up-to-date version of his scientific position. Lane is a scientist with original ideas and is not afraid to tackle the most intractable problems in evolution and the origin of life. He doesn't hesitate to confront some mainstream ideas in evolutionary biology. Refreshingly, he adds that his ideas might be wrong! Moreover, he is an excellent popularizer of science. His lectures continue to broaden and sharpen my understanding.
|
| The chemistry is older than genes [52:45] |
The latest evidence shows that Bacteria and Archaea are significantly different in
their genetics, but share the same chemistry. The genes and enzymes that
katalyse the biochemical reactions are not the same [1]. So this is
spontaneous chemistry. Again, this is an argument for the primacy of
chemistry and metabolism. Genes and enzymes arise later [2].
Read more...



